FSZ - Free Speech Zone Blog - freespeechzoneblog.com

The Simple Arithmetic of Obama's Idiotic "Stimulus"

by: Jacob Freeze

Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 23:49:46 PM EST


( - promoted by Jack's Smirking Revenge)


Unemployment in Detroit approaches 50%

Although 83% of Democrats (meaning "TV-intoxicated monkeys") still approve of Obama's "job performance," which isn't much different from approving of the "job performance" of a hockey puck that Republicans have been slapping around for 13 months...

Although millions of TV-intoxicated monkeys still approve of Obama's "performance" as President, which isn't much different from approving of Donald Duck's "performance" as King Lear...

While the economy continues to shed jobs, the war in Afghanistan gets bigger, Obama's generals talk about "delaying" withdrawal from Iraq, and hundreds of thousands of workers give up even looking for work every month...

Democratic monkey-economists are constantly paraded around the networks to explain how Obama's idiotic "stimulus" succeeded, because without Obama's idiotic "stimulus" everything would be even worse...

And the Democratic monkey-economists know that everything would be even worse without Obama's idiotic "stimulus" because none of them can predict or explain fuck-all, and the economic melt-down hit us like a run-away bus without so much as one millisecond of warning from Democratic monkey-economists or the Democratic monkey-politicians who rolled and rolled and rolled over for Bush for eight long years.

But instead of believing all those ridiculous monkeys and their catastrophically discredited theories, maybe we should ask ourselves how many jobs the same amount of money as Obama's idiotic "stimulus" could have created if Obama had simply hired workers for public works.

If we spread out the "stimulus" of $780 billion over five years, and hired workers at $30,000 per annum, which would give a working mom and dad, for example, a respectable middle-class income of $60,000, then 1,000,000 jobs cost $30 billion per year, and $150 billion over five years, so...

The same amount of money as Obama's idiotic "stimulus" could have created and maintained more than 5,000,000 jobs for five years.

5,000,000 jobs for five years!

But instead the monkey-Democrats and President "Hockey-Puck" Obama...

Instead the monkey-Democrats and President "Donald Duck" Obama gave us...

An idiotic "stimulus" stuffed with tax cuts, and 4,000,000 jobs disappeared since January 20, 2009, when Barack Obama was inaugurated as President of the United States.

Jacob Freeze :: The Simple Arithmetic of Obama's Idiotic "Stimulus"
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Non-wage compensation (4.67 / 3)
Even increasing total compensation to $40,000, the same $780 billion creates and maintains 4,000,000 jobs for almost four years (47 months), about twice as long as the current "stimulus," and still covers all the 4,000,000 people who have lost their jobs while Obama dithered.

Thanks for the promo, Jack! (5.00 / 1)
I added an image especially for the front page!

"National defense" instead of jobs (5.00 / 2)
It may also be worth mentioning that if the huge defense budget were applied to an efficient jobs program, unemployment would more or less vanish, because "national defense" is a very capital-intensive business, and only a small fraction pays salaries, or even provides indirect employment.

Last year Frida Berrigan posted an excellent discussion of that problem on TomDispatch.

Economists have also weighed in on why "war for jobs" as a way out of recession or depression has entered the world of mythology. An analysis from the University of Massachusetts' Political Economy Research Institute, for instance, finds that, for every one billion dollars invested in defense, 8,555 jobs are created. By contrast, the same billion invested in health care would create 12,883 jobs, and in education, 17,687 jobs or more than double the defense stimulus payoff.

This estimate was partly based on previous research by Robert Pollin and Heidi Garrett-Peltier at U Mass in Amherst in 2007, who concluded that "spending on personal consumption, health care, education, mass transit, and construction for home weatherization and infrastructure repair all create more jobs per $1 billon in expenditures relative to military spending," and approximately the same results had been previously reported by Medoff et. al. based on the relatively simple input-output model developed by Nobel Laureate economist Wassily Leontief, "with many subsequent refinements by Leontief and others."


Inotherwords, what it boils down to (5.00 / 1)
is something that we've had all along....a wartime economy.

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

[ Parent ]
No. (5.00 / 1)
As above...

For every one billion dollars invested in defense, 8,555 jobs are created. By contrast, the same billion invested in health care would create 12,883 jobs, and in education, 17,687 jobs or more than double the defense stimulus payoff.
 

[ Parent ]
You've got a point, Jacob Freeze, but (4.50 / 2)
by investing all these billions of dollars in defense, they've created a war-time economy.  

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

[ Parent ]
Of course, the wartime economy produces nothing (4.00 / 1)
you can eat, sleep in, drive, learn from, or get repaired by.

Bombs displace houses, hospitals, schools, food, clothing.

A bomb factory manufactures evil.

"Our purpose is aligning culture to human nature."


[ Parent ]
Obama has only been in office for a year. Give him a chance. (19.14 / 7)
If Obama hadn't done the stimulus we would have lost our talent pool at the banks and brokerage firms. These talented individuals, some of whom are double jointed, others who can wiggle in rooms without being noticed, would have left America businesses  to join foreign firms where their considerable talents would have been used, perhaps against American interests.

And I really find it offensive to call our President a Hockey Puck. What's that supposed to mean?

Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human


Excellent comment! (6.00 / 2)
These talented individuals, some of whom are double jointed, others who can wiggle in rooms without being noticed...

Harharharhar!!!


[ Parent ]
Sorry, Stu, but (0.00 / 0)
I disagree here.

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

[ Parent ]
M - PLO? (36.67 / 3)
I still want to know what PLO means in your name?

I suspect the worst.

Who are you really communicating with? I know your sending messages in code to them. Don't think some of us aren't watching you.

Each time there has been an attack...the recent Pentagon firefight, the Joe what's his name with the plane in the IRS building, the plane with the terrorist guy setting himself on fire....YOU mplo posted comments which I believe were in code directing these attacks on this board that very same day. Comments which I am collecting and which point to YOU as the brains or at least messenger behind these attacks.

I'll be sending my findings to the attorney for the Northern District of Illinois...maybe you have heard of him...Patrick Fitzgerald...he loves to put terrorists in jail....but not people like Bush and Cheney ...they aren't terrorists.


Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human


[ Parent ]
Hold on there a minute, Stu. (5.00 / 1)
If you're being snarky, I fail to see the humour in it.

If, on the other hand, you're serious, cool it, or you're likely to wind up in trouble, not me.

I also might add that, because my last name begins with a p and also has the letters l and o in it, that I decided to put it in that way as an abbreviation, if one gets the drift.  thus mplo.

Or, am I supposed to change my username on here just to avoid the possibility of my being sent off and imprisoned somewhere?  

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)


[ Parent ]
Name (52.50 / 2)
...my last name begins with a p and also has the letters l and o in it...

Polaroid?

PlaySkool?

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?


[ Parent ]
Nope! (0.00 / 0)
n/t

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

[ Parent ]
MPLO Terrorist (52.50 / 2)
How would I end up in trouble if I exposed you as a terrorist?

Iv'e exposed Markos Moulitsas as a person involved with the CIA.

I'll do the same to you. PLO..it's just a koinkadink you say. Your last name begins with a P and also has the letters L and O. It's a code callling for more terrorists attacks....

Your whole comment is in code.

Each sixteenth letter counting the apostrophe....  SN ...A...RKY....A is the sixteenth letter....says the following....ATTACK THE OCTAGON.

There's no date however.

Were watching YOU.

I've already called Fitzgeralds office, I have been able to speak to him personally but I described this site and your name.

Pat will get back to me, he always does.

I'll see you behind bars soon.

it's late I have to sleep or I would go on .........


Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human


[ Parent ]
Just what the hell do you think you're doing, Stu? (0.00 / 0)
I mean, really.  Just who do you think you are?

Stu...you're a nasty piece of junk and I don't like you. You're a nasty little fuckwad who likes to try to get people in trouble.

and...fuck the rest of you for taking this stupid shit's side over mine and not shutting him up.

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)


[ Parent ]
All I can say is this, Stu; (0.00 / 0)
You're a complete and total jackass.

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

[ Parent ]
I make the joke, yes? (0.00 / 0)
I'm just joking.  

Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human

[ Parent ]
SIMPLE analysis is the right term. (0.00 / 0)

You may have been taken by surprise, but I wasn't.

It's simple. SHARE or we all die.

It's the scorpion and the frog fable.

We're the frog. The rich are the scorpion.

There, I 'splained it all for ya, Lucy.

"Our purpose is aligning culture to human nature."


Menu

Make a New Account

Speaker:

Assword:



Forget your username or password?



Bloggers' Rights at EFF



Photobucket


Search




Advanced Search


Blogroll

My Left Wing
Progressive Independence
European Tribune
Boing Boing
Pffugee Camp
Talking Points Memo
CEPHALOBLOG
Booman Tribune
Underwater Deli
Raw Story
Brad Blog
Bailout Sleuth
Zero Paid
Wiki Leaks
Rebel Reports
Taibblog
Metafilter
Zero Hedge
TorrentFreak
Craphound
Adbusters
TED
Lifehacker
Truth Dig

Open Education
-Connexions
-The Library

Useful Resources
-Open Secrets
-Project Vote Smart
-FactCheck
-LegiStorm
-Open Congress
-Current Legislation
-Corporate Escort Service
-Wikinews

Fuck The Banks
-Bank Of America Sux
-Move Your Money
-Goldman Sachs Sucks

Other Useful Resources
-4chan
-Something Awful
-Maddox
-eBaum's World
-Newgrounds

Support Open Source
-Open Source Initiative
-Source Forge
-Open Source Mac
-Center For Democracy & Technology
-Open Internet

Tools For The People's Bailout
-uTorrent
-Rocket Torrents
-FrostWire
-Download From YouTube (Mozilla Firefox Add-on)

Thieves and Beggars
-Torrentz
-isoHunt
-Hexagon
-The Pirate Bay
-h33t
-TorrentBox


FSZ - Free Speech Zone - www.freespeechzoneblog.com

All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Free Speech Zone makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis by individual diarists, independent journalists, and the views herein are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the people who run this site. Free Speech Zone is a "common carrier" and the views presented herein are in no way endorsed, condoned, or representative of Free Speech Zone, its owners, or management.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

-First Amendment to the United States Constitution


Powered by: SoapBlox