FSZ - Free Speech Zone Blog - freespeechzoneblog.com

Nourishing the Planet Featured on Eco-Chick

by: BorderJumpers

Thu Mar 04, 2010 at 10:01:58 AM EST


( - promoted by Jack's Smirking Revenge)

Check out this interview featured in Eco-Chick about the Worldwatch Institute's Nourishing the Planet's on-the-ground research in Africa by Stephanie Rogers:

If it's true that there are sayers and there are doers, Danielle Nierenberg falls firmly into the latter camp. Danielle is currently traveling through sub-saharan Africa to highlight stories of hope and success in sustainable agriculture and blogging about it at WorldWatch.org.

A Senior Researcher at the Worldwatch Institute and co-Project Director of State of World 2011: Nourishing the Planet, Danielle is a widely cited expert in sustainable agriculture issues and the spread of factory farming. She knows better than most of us how our eating habits affect the world, and the experiences she shares on her blog will blow you away.

So of course, Danielle fits right in as an Eco Chick Heroine for the Planet! I talked to her about women in agriculture, global food issues and what we can all do to help.

SR: We were surprised to learn through your blog, Nourishing the Planet, that 80% of sub-Saharan farmers in Africa are women and that women make up the majority of farmers worldwide. What are some of the unique problems that female farmers face?

DN: Although women produce most of the food and raise most of the livestock in Africa, they rarely have access to land tenure, credit, agricultural extension services, and are under-represented in farmers groups, associations, unions. But by increasing women's participation and representation in these groups, women and men farmers alike can work together to improve gender awareness, as well as improve their access to loans and agricultural inputs and land tenure. As a result, women are able to earn a greater income, which translates into better nutrition for their families. But womens voices often go unheard, or even ignored, and that has to change.

SR: How has your focus on sustainable agriculture influenced your own eating habits?


DN: I've been a vegetarian since I was a teenager, but the more I learn about the global food system, the more interested I become in knowing where my food comes from and how it was produced. I think it's important to put a face to your food and know not only how the animals you eat were treated, but if the farmers who raised the vegetables and other foods you eat were given a fair price for their crops and if the workers who processed and packaged the food you eat had safe working conditions and were paid a fair wage.

SR: As much as we all care about global food issues and how they affect human health and the environment, sometimes we're not sure how to help - and sometimes, the problems of people in third-world countries can seem so far away. What can we do to contribute, even if it's just in a small way?

DN: This is a question we're asking as part of our Nourishing the Planet project: Why should wealthy foodies in the United States and Europe care about hunger in Africa?

The foodie community in the United States and Europe are a powerful force in pushing for organically grown and local foods in hospitals and schools, more farmers markets, and better welfare of livestock and I think that some of that energy can be harnessed to promote more diversity and resilience in the food system. Right now, the world depends on just a few crops-maize, wheat, and rice-which are vulnerable not only to price fluctuations, but the impacts of climate change. Many indigenous crops-including millet, sorghum, sweet potato, and many others-however, are not only more nutritious than monoculture crops, but also more resilient to adverse weather events and disease.

By supporting-and funding-NGOs and research institutions, such as Slow Food International, Heifer International, and the World Vegetable Center, wealthy foodies can help ensure that farmers in sub-Saharan Africa help maintain agricultural biodiversity.

SR: Did you have any moments of extreme culture shock when you first got to Africa?

DN: We started this trip in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, a place most Americans associate with war and hunger because of the famines of the mid 1980s and 1990s. Even today, more than 6 million people in Ethiopia are at risk for starvation so I think I had mentally prepared myself for seeing very desperate people. Instead, though, I found farmers and NGO workers full of hope for agriculture in their country. I think that's been my greatest surprise about the continent in general - how vibrant, entrepreneurial, friendly, positive, and alive people are here. Six months and thirteen countries later, I'm now in Antananarivo, Madagascar, feeling more hopeful than ever that things are really changing.

The trip is surprising in a lot of different ways. While we've seen extreme poverty and environmental degradation during our trip, we've also been impressed by the level of knowledge about things like hunger, climate change, HIV/AIDS and other issues from the farmers we meet. The people in many of these countries know better than anyone how to solve the problems their facing, they just need attention-and support-from the international community. In Africa, maybe more than anywhere else we've traveled, a little funding can go a long way (if used the right way).

SR: What's your biggest goal for the Nourishing the Planet trip?

DN: We've made a point during this trip to focus on stories of hope and success in agriculture. Most of what Americans hear about Africa is famine, conflict and HIV/AIDS, and we wanted to highlight the things that are going well on the continent. There's a lot of hope out here - a lot of individuals and organizations doing terrific work - but that doesn't necessarily translate into them receiving resources or funding.

We hope to create a roadmap for funders and the donor community and shine a big spotlight on the projects and innovations that seem to be working, so that they can be scaled up or replicated in other places. Please check out our site and sign up for our weekly newsletter - and if you know anyone or project we should visit on the continent, please email me at dnierenberg@worldwatch.org.

Thanks Danielle, and many thanks as well to Bernard Pollack for the beautiful photos!

BorderJumpers :: Nourishing the Planet Featured on Eco-Chick
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
China (5.00 / 1)
What's China doing in Africa?

Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human

You are probably already aware of this (5.00 / 1)
but they are currently there because they are buying up all the arable land to grow food.

For China.

China has quite a big desert developing in what once used to be decent land.

Other countries are doing the same thing there.

Maybe they'll ship table scraps back to Africa.

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. -H. L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Stu Piddy (5.00 / 1)
You ask a very important question. China is more present on the continent than we ever imagined.

We have mixed feelings about it. On one hand, they are building tons of infrastructure (which is good), we saw recently built Chinese roads all over rural Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and other countries.

The idea in some circumstances (beside building good-will with these countries) is to give more farmers access to markets (so they expand access to food). In some cases, they even provide all farmers with cell phones.

The bad news is that sometimes entire markets are sold before locals have a chance to buy anything or worse that prices are drastically impacted so that people can afford them.

In Ethiopia we wrote a short piece about it here:
http://borderjumpers1.blogspot...

We will continue to write about this important issue as we head to West Africa and beyond...

All the best, Bernie and Dani (aka BorderJumpers)


Africans are Livestock to Chinese (6.00 / 1)
China is a predator. America is a Predator. To imagine that there are good things and bad things that China is doing is what it's all about....deception.

This is the same kind of catastrophic thinking that allows America to elect a Bush and a Obama and to continue these endless wars in the Mid East...the idea that although some bad things are happening in Iraq and Afghanistan....(about 40-50% of the Iraqi people have been displaced, killed, injured and jailed) there are some good things! Now they have a democracy! And they can vote for the candidate that America allows. And in Afghanistan women will be allowed to have an education...if they had let them alone in the first place, instead of supporting the Taliban..that would be true.

There are NO GOOD things that come out of American or Chinese involvement in other countries.

Do people really need roads and computers and cell phones?

I don't think they do need them. They are used to further Chinese interests not African interests. The predator is simply fattening up it's livestock for later consumption.

Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human


[ Parent ]
Flash News Bulletin - USA Is Bankrupt (1.00 / 1)
I suppose it's pleasant to contemplate the wonderful things that are going on in China Africa. It's nice to know that black people can do great things with agriculture. George Washington Carver comes to mind, a black man at Tuskegee University in Alabama, discovered 118 ways to utilize sweet potatoes, and 300 products derived from peanuts, and helped the South to reduce dependence on cotton. It's nice that these two people can afford to tour all of Africa and write these nifty, albeit rather lengthy reports. At least we get to watch a pleasant movie about refreshingly upbeat view of another world. I hate to interrupt such a pleasant narrative, but, well, the ship is sinking folks.

Now interestingly, the very astute Alexander Cockburn has this to say about mainstream NGO liberalism:

....remember that mainstream NGO liberalism-starting with Rockefeller and particularly saturating every environmental foundation-is built on the bedrock of demographic panic about the pullulating poor, particularly the brown and black and yellow hordes. Every billionaire setting up his foundation almost invariably has population control in his mandate. Shoulder to shoulder with hysteria about immigrant crime waves rides fear of the fecund darker races. So I think we can surmise an instinctive racist bias among foundation liberals, their likely belief that Hispanics do commit more crimes and hence their desire to steer clear of all data that they fear might ratify this instinct.

So this pleasant narrative would appear to contradict that completely. I protested Vietnam (And Iraq), so I've been around, and I don't trust mainstream NGO liberals one bit further than I can throw them. I know we have a fine show here, but it is high time to be heading for the life-rafts.

The "Great Depression" of the 1930s was harsh. But I knew many of it's survivors. The factories were still in our towns. The workers still retained great skill. This is emphatically not the situation we have today. So we obviously are heading into something vastly worse than the first "Great Depression." Maybe you don't want to hear this. By the way, the Icelanders are voting today:

REYKJAVIK (AFP) - Icelanders headed to the polls in drizzling rain on Saturday in a referendum expected to reject a bank repayment deal worth billions that many here consider a foreign diktat.

"I will vote 'no' simply because I disagree very strongly with us... having to shoulder this burden" from the 2008 collapse of the online Icesave bank, Ingimar Gudmundsson, a 57-year-old truck driver, told AFP.

The issue is whether Iceland should honour an agreement to repay Britain and the Netherlands 3.9 billion euros (5.3 billion dollars).

Okay, back to the fine "reality show." See you in the water.

Support The Freedom And Equality Party!


blues (0.00 / 0)
Once again you leave us speechless...


[ Parent ]
Questions for Border Jumpers (0.00 / 0)
I looked briefly into world watchers....a few weeks ago...I think it was world watchers....nothing stuck me particularly about world watchers in terms of their associations....but If I were to look further would I find something?....like associations with right wing think tanks, religous orgnanizations (in other words missionary workers ostensibly used  to convert or inform non-believers in Africa about Jesus...and this is a very profitable enterprise) or funding indirectly from U.S. government or CIA?

The CIA currently uses NGO's ...nice sounding organizations with names like the "International Center for Non-Violent Conflict" as fronts for their information gathering activities and simply put places where their agents work amongst people who are, or who imagine themselves to be, perhaps like some in border jumpers, to be interested in the work they are doing for the reasons they say they are doing the work.

Can you tell us something about the behind the scenes machinations of Border Jumpers? Where does the money come from?

I'm not saying or suggesting anything about Border Jumpers....I'm just asking the question. I don't know anything really about Border Jumpers. But since I am now exposed to them, I wonder who they are.

Are there any religous, governmental, private foundation connections and who are the people who manage and head these possible connections?

Thanks...and think about it carefully and perhaps even skeptically  before you answer.

Stu Piddy...a Free Range Human


[ Parent ]
Border Jumpers (51.00 / 2)
seems to be exactly what their website presents--a nice young couple touring Africa, looking for and publicizing the positive.  If we go by the MSM, all of Black Africa is nothing but a Hell On Earth, but that's not what I hear from people who have been there.

As for their money, what money?  My fat cat brother-in-law spent more in Africa in a month than these people would need for a year.


[ Parent ]
These People Have Very Heavy Connections. Doesn't Mean They're Evil, But Then... (1.00 / 1)
[ Parent ]
How Relevant Is Worldwatch? (0.00 / 0)
Since people are asking, here are some links providing an overview of Worldwatch Institute. I have read that this organization has been sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, and is presently sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Some people have questioned what exactly Worldwatch proposes to do about the population overshoot that it tends to be very concerned about. Here are the links:

Worldwatch Plays Along: Malthus, Biofuels and Free-Market Environmentalism

Worldwatch Global Partners

Worldwatch Global Partners (Map)

The Worldwatch Foundation is very concerned with overpopulation, desertification, and food production. I have often proposed that desertification has been ongoing since the last ice age, and may become a global disaster unless another ice age (which many claim is historically overdue) arrives soon. Equally important, the world will simply completely run out of usable fossil fuel in about one generation.  And we cannot agricultural chemicals, or run any farm equipment without energy. Period.

In the end, only nuclear energy will provide the power to maintain human life on the earth. There are presently just four kinds of nuclear energy available. One is the uranium reactor. It is so dangerous and toxic that it will never be truly practical, since has a natural chemical affinity for DNA, and takes billions of years to decompose. Another solution is thorium reactor, the by-products of which only take a few centuries to degrade, and cannot be used for the production of nuclear bombs. In any case, there actually not enough uranium or thorium on earth to last very long. So the answer will have to be nuclear fusion.

There are presently two basic types of fusion reactors - neutronic thermal reactors and "aneutronic" proton-boron reactors. The neutronic thermal reactors do cause their containers to become radioactive (but do not involve uranium). Being thermal reactors, they, like the uranium and thorium ones, are essentially enormous "steam engines" and therefor must be located near rivers, large lakes, or oceans. Unfortunately, human beings appear to have an instinct for living near these bodies of water (perhaps because fish are the most natural food for them). And all these reactors are inherently accident prone.

The possibly viable alternative is the aneutronic proton-boron reactor, which produces little heat and virtually no radioactivity or radioactive byproducts. Instead, it releases energy in the form of charged particles and X-rays, which can be transformed almost directly into electricity or perhaps even fuel. The requisite quantities of proton and boron are present on earth to power civilization for, perhaps, millions of years! And the potentially vast amount of energy they could provide could be enough to desalinize seawater, and provide industrial and agricultural chemical byproducts as well! Here are some links about that:

Focusfusion.org

Focus Fusion LPP Experiment

Could A Deuterium-Boron Fusion Reactor Be Used To Produce H2O2 As A Fuel?

Apparently I mistakenly thought they would use alpha particles (from helium) with boron in the reaction. Looks like they will use protons (from hydrogen) and boron.

Support The Freedom And Equality Party!


Sorry, I Mixed Up Deuterium and Helium (0.00 / 0)
Deuterium has one proton and one neutron + one electron. Helium has two of each + two electrons, and hydrogen has just one proton + one electron (the electrons must equal the protons). Alpha particles are the nuclei of helium atoms, and protons are the nuclei of hydrogen atoms. Bad blog day.

Support The Freedom And Equality Party!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Speaker:

Assword:



Forget your username or password?



Bloggers' Rights at EFF



Photobucket


Search




Advanced Search


Blogroll

My Left Wing
Progressive Independence
European Tribune
Boing Boing
Pffugee Camp
Talking Points Memo
CEPHALOBLOG
Booman Tribune
Underwater Deli
Raw Story
Brad Blog
Bailout Sleuth
Zero Paid
Wiki Leaks
Rebel Reports
Taibblog
Metafilter
Zero Hedge
TorrentFreak
Craphound
Adbusters
TED
Lifehacker
Truth Dig

Open Education
-Connexions
-The Library

Useful Resources
-Open Secrets
-Project Vote Smart
-FactCheck
-LegiStorm
-Open Congress
-Current Legislation
-Corporate Escort Service
-Wikinews

Fuck The Banks
-Bank Of America Sux
-Move Your Money
-Goldman Sachs Sucks

Other Useful Resources
-4chan
-Something Awful
-Maddox
-eBaum's World
-Newgrounds

Support Open Source
-Open Source Initiative
-Source Forge
-Open Source Mac
-Center For Democracy & Technology
-Open Internet

Tools For The People's Bailout
-uTorrent
-Rocket Torrents
-FrostWire
-Download From YouTube (Mozilla Firefox Add-on)

Thieves and Beggars
-Torrentz
-isoHunt
-Hexagon
-The Pirate Bay
-h33t
-TorrentBox


FSZ - Free Speech Zone - www.freespeechzoneblog.com

All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Free Speech Zone makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis by individual diarists, independent journalists, and the views herein are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of the people who run this site. Free Speech Zone is a "common carrier" and the views presented herein are in no way endorsed, condoned, or representative of Free Speech Zone, its owners, or management.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

-First Amendment to the United States Constitution


Powered by: SoapBlox